| |
|
|
| |
Growth - Domestic ETFs
|
|
 |
| |
About Growth - Domestic ETFs |
|
Growth- Domestic ETFs Overview and forecast
Some of the Growth- Domestic ETFs look like vindications for economists, going up and down in almost exact rhythm with those broad based headlines about economic downturns and upswings. Their charts look exactly like that. One of the Growth- Domestic ETFs fund manager, Direxion, has both Bull and a Bear Growth- Domestic ETFs, and if you compare charts, they're like mirror images.
These aren't the most glamorous of the ETFs, but they're among the longest running, and until the 2008 crash many of them were performing very solidly, and doing well for their investors. The change in market environment wasn't at all kind to them, and they experienced some big drops, off historic highs in some cases.
They're not all fantastic traders, either, but some of the specialist Growth- Domestic ETFs and ETNs do get significant trader interest, and their charts indicate that some of them can do quite well on a two week time frame, in terms of margins. These ETFs are structured on the conservative, more traditional ETF model, with formulas and performance guidelines based on total returns.
Short term (6 months)
The upswing in the first half of 2009 has been the first good news the Growth- Domestic ETFs have had for a while, and their overall economic relationship seems to be holding good. In the short term, however, their returns are relatively slow, off a low base, and making up ground. They've proved to have some value as traders, but may not be to everyone's taste in terms of upside vs. time ratios.
There is, however, a caveat on some of the Growth- Domestic ETFs. The specialists, notably in the Large Cap and Agriculture areas, have the ability to move well, as the stock markets and global trade pick up. The potential is pretty clear that the demand is increasing, if not very dramatically, but a hotter market could add significant value to these ETFs, particularly if S&P prices and agriculture orders and prices show any upward moves.
Medium term (2 years)
The longer view is much better for the Growth- Domestic ETFs. The economic equation includes an eventual recovery across sectors where these ETFs are based, and it's reasonable to believe that their prices might return to more appropriate levels in this period. It's only fair to mention that the Growth- Domestic ETFs are based on fundamentally conventional asset bases, and they can be considered to have been oversold to some extent, relative to their strictly technical weightings and spreads of investments.
However- These are not big traders or movers, in the conventional market sense. They take time, and an aggregate increase over the two year period is a much more realistic scenario than big spikes. The Growth- Domestic ETFs just don't behave like the big movers on other markets. A fund like ProShares Ultra Dow 30 (DDM), (which is an exception to the general trading behavior of the Growth- Domestic ETFs, and a directly market linked fund based on producing a 2X return on the Dow), may move fast and far, in either direction, but the others in this class don't, and can't, perform like that.
Long term (5 years)
The economic approach also tends to favor the long term, but after a significant level of recovery, the default position for the Growth- Domestic ETFs is their own niches in the market. The first year or so of this term may well see a standardized recovery across the board, particularly in the strictly conventional ETF models, but after that they'll be working on their own indices. That is a definite consideration in any long view, because performances can either stagnate or take off, depending on the ETF's model.
It is quite possible that the level of interest in some of the specialist areas covered by the Growth- Domestic ETFs will generate a lot more activity, particularly in food and agriculture. That could signal strong performances, because there's a general opinion that these sectors are undervalued, and will have major growth potential for investors in the next decade or so. It remains to be seen if the market analysts are prepared to put their money where their mouths are, but demand is getting noticeably stronger in those sectors.
Qualifiers to projections
This is a very diverse group, and generalizations should be avoided when considering investment in the class. As you can see from our chart, returns are quite variable, and upsides and downsides are based on specific funds. Although the image of the class is generically economic market and index based, these ETFs are often very different, and investors should work their spreads very selectively within the range available. http://www.etftips.com/Growth-_-Domestic
Price ranges in the Large Cap and Dow sectors are showing good margins, and reasonably good volumes relative to prices. Trading behavior is a bit different in some ETF classes, and in this case prices can be seen to rise on relatively thin volumes as well as the more normal big moves. As investments, the overall view is of a class of ETFs which shows definite upsides, but because of the variable performances, investors would need to judge entry and exit points to extract best values over the long, medium, and short terms.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated on: 2010-01-14 02:03:40 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Quotes are updated automatically. Quotes are delayed. Etftips.com has not
reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity the data. Etftips.com shall not be
liable for any actions taken in thereon. All information provided "as is" for
informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice.
Neither Etftips.com nor any of independent providers is liable for any
informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any action taken in
reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Etftips.com site, you
agree not to redistribute the information found herein. ETF Values can go up as
well as down.
|
| |
| Copyright EtfTips.com ©2009 |
|
|
| |
|
|
